That's what I thought was going on from the discussion. Glad to see that it's not just me reading it that way. I'd think then that if GRSec is doing it, and i

That's what I thought was going on from the discussion. Glad to see that it's not just me reading it that way. I'd think then that if GRSec is doing it, and intending to use it that way (I am not a lawyer) then it would appear to me that the assertion that they're violating the GPL since they're adding another restriction on distribution.