New theory to me. How did walkable development lead to ~$5k/mo 2br apartments in SF? If the theory is true, what are its implications? That even more auto-orien

New theory to me. How did walkable development lead to ~$5k/mo 2br apartments in SF? If the theory is true, what are its implications? That even more auto-oriented development will make SF cheaper? Or that less development (or even destruction of existing housing) of any kind will make SF cheaper? Why do you mention megacities? Walkable development helps safety in cities of any size.