4 ms·
The difference is it's a noticeably sexist statement disguised as non-sexist. Would you argue that your statement "racist workplaces keep talented minorities o
by ihsw2 9y ago
The difference is it's a noticeably sexist statement disguised as non-sexist.
Would you argue that your statement "racist workplaces keep talented minorities out" is equal to "white workplaces keep talented minorities out?"
There is a difference between an argument against "bro culture" and an argument against "sexist culture" -- one is neutral whereas the other is clearly anti-male.
- amyjess 9y agoBro culture isn't the same thing as male culture. I personally know a lot of men who want nothing to do with bro culture, support feminism, and are generally good people. In fact, men who partake in bro culture have a number of slurs that they use to target men who want nothing to do with bro culture: these slurs include "nu-males" and "cucks" (and the latter has racist overtones, too). So, yes, I want the men who get slurred as "nu-males" to completely push bro culture out of the tech industry and replace them.
- hueving 9y agoI think you're confusing bro culture with red pillers.
- jbmorgado 9y agoI think you are actually being fed some propaganda about what red pillers are, cause after researching a bit, they are certainly not what you are saying they are. Check the documentary The Red Pill, it's made by an actual feminist (not 3rd wave) and she actually gives a balanced and honest view of the movement: http://theredpillmovie.com/ http://theredpillmovie.com/ Also, the 3rd wave feminist movements tried to shut the documentary down and the director had to resort to a crowdfunding campaign in order to be able to finish filming it.
- greglindahl 9y agoHN: a place where it's more interesting to debate how to label men who say 'cuck' than it is to debate whether or not calling people 'cucks' is positive for a company's culture.
- kevintb 9y agoYou seem to be confused by the definitions of "men" and "bro culture"