3 ms·
That 424million should be 424,000, so we are back at 300m deep. Except the ESB doesn't fill anywhere near all of the (2 acres x 443m) cuboid, so 100m is closer.
by dmurray 9y ago
That 424million should be 424,000, so we are back at 300m deep. Except the ESB doesn't fill anywhere near all of the (2 acres x 443m) cuboid, so 100m is closer.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- Retric 9y agoYea, I was thinking they where off by 1000 somewhere. Checking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California gives (423,970 km2). And yea, 1/3 of the volume is a better approximation but the numbers where so far off that seemed less useful.