4 ms·
I imagine this comes with massive overheads in regards to data and ram usage, both of which are precious commodities on mobile platforms.
by nannal 9y ago
I imagine this comes with massive overheads in regards to data and ram usage, both of which are precious commodities on mobile platforms.
- onli 9y agoAt least when following this example the site should work just fine when JS is disabled, which was the main issue I had when I tried following google's (?) tutorial on how to use service workers to make webapps work offline. That one revamped the whole site into a JS app powered by service workers, with a blank white page remaining without JS. Not the case here. I don't think this approach here should cost much performance. It is just a thread checking a cache (that will be on disk) on page load.