4 ms·
Not quite. You could make it a legally punishable offense to provide incorrect information to a weather oracle. The provider would be sent to jail for defraudin
by RexetBlell 9y ago
Not quite. You could make it a legally punishable offense to provide incorrect information to a weather oracle. The provider would be sent to jail for defrauding the oracle.
I'm just saying that it's possible to solve the problem the same way that it is solved today.
- candiodari 9y agoNot really. The basic problem is "fractional reserve". Essentially an insurance company will only have about 5% of the money needed to pay out their policies (less in Europe, around 2.5%, and there's other variations across the world). (Even then significant amounts of that 5% would be either loans or shares, which are technically also loans. Most large insurers would go bankrupt if their risk assessments were off by 1%). Since this is the exact thing that the double spending algorithm would check against this wouldn't be allowed, and therefore you can't have normal insurance in a blockchain world.