The best argument against dynamodb is the aws "well architected" guidelines - how are you designing for resiliency with your single region, active-passive datab

The best argument against dynamodb is the aws "well architected" guidelines - how are you designing for resiliency with your single region, active-passive database with clunky bolt on replication using kinesis? Cheaper active-active-active options exist that don't require manual dr failover drills and manual failback when regions inevitably crash.