3 ms·
There's been much work on this in graph and information-theory. To the point of centralization: it's a trade-off between efficiency and robustness (for one thin
by vbuwivbiu 9y ago
There's been much work on this in graph and information-theory. To the point of centralization: it's a trade-off between efficiency and robustness (for one thing). Most living systems show evidence of this trade-off, having a mixture of centralization and distributed processing. For example, the body has a distributed blood supply (all cells share the same network) but has a central heart. Cells themselves have mixed centralized components (the nucleus, various organelles) and distributed aspects (the cyctoplasm, parallel transcription of DNA and production of proteins etc). The brain does distributed parallel processing but has centralized components (the amygdala, the pituitary gland, the cerebellum)
- shishy 9y agoI'm fairly new to this but would love to learn more. Could you point me to some resources/papers to look into and read to find out more?
- specializeded 9y agoPlease come back and share some resources if possible, googling variations of “centralization” and “information/graph theory” as we speak!
- vbuwivbiu 9y agosearch for "centrality", "networks", "degree", "betweenness", "robustness", "information-processing", "motif", "graph"
- specializeded 9y agoThank you very much!