3 ms·
Having a steady stream of noisy neighbours is no different from having one. The solution is the same; hold whoever rents the apartment accountable. (This would
by fgf 16y ago
Having a steady stream of noisy neighbours is no different from having one. The solution is the same; hold whoever rents the apartment accountable. (This would be easier if throwing people out was.)
- fgf 16y agoSeriously? If a couple gets drunk and play loud music 4 nights a week thats equal too a couple of tourists doing the same thing. And I would bet that loud tourists are a very small subset of noisy neighbours; in any case the person who rents the apartment can and should be held accountable. It should also be obvious that laws that make it easier for landlords to throw out renters who create problems (and perhaps make them liable if they don't) could effectively solve this problem. There is a difference between brevity and snarkiness.
- varjag 16y agoUh no. You can have a noisy neighbor, go through a lengthy feud involving building administration and law enforcement, and finally make them reasonably quiet at night. Now, try doing that with the tourists who are in just for a couple of days and don't give a damn.
- fgf 16y agoUh yes. You can have a neighbour who trough airbnb rents out to noisy tourists, go through a lengthy feud involving building administration and law enforcement, and finally make sure he makes sure it's reasonably quiet at night. If any changes in laws would be necessary to make these processes identical they should be smaller and less disruptive than an outright ban on activities like those of airbnbs lenders.