5 ms·
> This is a combination of the power of server machine and the convenience of the web. Just to clarify, Qt WebGL Streaming is not a video streaming solution, s
by RussianCow 9y ago
> This is a combination of the power of server machine and the convenience of the web.
Just to clarify, Qt WebGL Streaming is not a video streaming solution, so the rendering still happens in the browser via WebGL. The hardware requirements to run a graphics app with this feature would be no lower than they would be to just run the Qt app natively, so the only benefit is the portability and accessibility of the web.
- billconan 9y agoI was talking about the software streaming use case, not implementation details. If you search this page, you will find my other threads mentioning my approach, which was based on video streaming.
- Crespyl 9y agoThough with applications not already designed to act as thin clients, it could potentially be useful. It doesn't take much horsepower to just open an application like Blender, but it might be useful to run it on a powerful server and access it from a lighter more power-efficient laptop.