24 ms·
Your "article" says they were offering it unknowingly. This does not support OP's implication that they dropped it to protest Obamacare.
by pyroinferno 9y ago
Your "article" says they were offering it unknowingly. This does not support OP's implication that they dropped it to protest Obamacare.
- tanderson92 9y agoNo, the article says they claimed they were offering it unknowingly. Here are the facts: > In 2012, a lawyer for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit Washington law firm, called Hobby Lobby's general counsel to inform him of the health law's contraception requirement and to ask whether the company wanted to file a suit. > Mr. Green says he was shocked to discover Hobby Lobby was in fact offering in its insurance plan some of the emergency contraceptives at issue. He called for the insurer to revoke that coverage and signed onto the lawsuit. He only dropped the coverage subsequent to being approached by a lawyer from a conservative group shopping for people to use to sue the government. Readers will draw their own conclusions but to me that does support the implication.