> a sufficient number of email recipients classify you as spam From Google's end, I can understand this decision. But from the consumer end, I only want that l

> a sufficient number of email recipients classify you as spam From Google's end, I can understand this decision. But from the consumer end, I only want that logic used for de novo email sources. Even if many people think a newsletter is spam, I'd want my personal patterns to override that. If I've opened letters from the same sender repeatedly and never marked one as spam, it shouldn't much matter what other users have to say. If I've ever explicitly taken a sender out of spam and not put them in spam, that should basically settle the matter. I regularly lose emails I've requested to Gmail spam, and even when I've un-spammed the same sender multiple times. I appreciate that Google achieves pre-emptive blocking via a large userbase, but I don't appreciate when the wisdom of the crowd overrules my own behavior.