3 ms·
I always use http://gitolite.com http://gitolite.com, thats enough. nb: I dont see the point of the graph about numbers of questions on SO. A high level of que
by dehef 9y ago
I always use http://gitolite.com http://gitolite.com, thats enough.
nb: I dont see the point of the graph about numbers of questions on SO. A high level of questions = A lot of problem, no :)?
- usernam 9y agoCouldn't agree more. Gitolite is enough for most use cases, and for technical users which often use other tools there's no need for a web interface (or anything beyond gitweb anyway). We use it in combination with BugsEverywhere for issue tracking, with the added advantage that bugs are tracked per-branch. You can work offline without issues. The major complaint with this system is the disconnect for users to report issues. BE includes a web frontend, but it's not great. We use mantis as a general tracker, but still keep detailed bug tracking in the VCS with BE.
- raziel2p 9y agoI really like gitolite, except how you need to add users and SSH keys through a git repository. I'd prefer just plain configuration files that I could manage with my configuration manager.
- lazarus101 9y agoI've wasted so many hours trying to convince Windows user that they don't need any passwords for gitolite, they just need to check that Pageant is running and has the right key loaded :D
- cat199 9y agogitolite + redmine = sweetness.
- lazarus101 9y agoYep, gitolite is awesome, it's so lightweight you can use pretty much any leftover PC to host repos for an entire company. I also use cgit for a fast and easy git web interface and ReviewBoard for code reviews. If I remember correctly gitlab initially started as a frontend for gitolite.