3 ms·
This seems an important point that hadn't occurred to me. Our food chain is already pretty dependent on Internet-connected infrastructure working correctly, but
by thom 9y ago
This seems an important point that hadn't occurred to me. Our food chain is already pretty dependent on Internet-connected infrastructure working correctly, but it seems absolutely plausible that this will be a future attack vector if we network and automate farming machinery.
- noir_lord 9y agoIf you can build a robot to go around destroying crops you can built a hunter-killer to go after the crop killing robots. The future gets scary fast when you consider the almost inevitable tick-tock between capability/defense.
- jessaustin 9y agoThe threat is not from unknown robots sneaking in to uproot crops (after all why not do something fast and cheap like spreading salt?). The threat is that the farmer's own weeding robots will be hacked to uproot crops, probably by ze Russians. Firmware updates should be secured.
- noir_lord 9y agoA threat not the only threat. Someone somewhere is working out how to weaponise them, we've as a species weaponised everything else we've ever invented pretty much.
- nashashmi 9y agoIt's the other way around: we have domesticated every weapon we have created for peaceful purposes.
- noir_lord 9y agoActually I like that, it's closer to the essential truth. I think George Carlin nailed it with his routine about flamethrowers. > The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I’m just not close enough to get the job done.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]