3 ms·
a woman’s bones (now lost). I thought the consensus was that they turned out to be a man's bones (and not even matching Earhart's proportions). Which may expl
by kafkaesq 9y ago
a woman’s bones (now lost).
I thought the consensus was that they turned out to be a man's bones (and not even matching Earhart's proportions). Which may explain why they ended up getting "lost".
That leaves us with just that patch of aluminum, of unconfirmed origin. I would call that kind of an indication "mildly" rather than "extremely" suggestive.
- abritinthebay 9y agoNo, that was the initial conclusion but later analysis (of the measurements) put it within the (non typical) range of her.. remember- it was partial remains too. They also found a woman’s shoe and a sextant with a serial in the range that would have been issued to her. It’s not conclusive at all, I agree, but it’s got vastly more evidence (that is otherwise not easily explainable) than any other theory.