3 ms·

I mentioned this at the time too: I think this was a deliberate decision by Microsoft and it is not a deal-breaker. LSP is a Minimum Viable Product that was del

I mentioned this at the time too: I think this was a deliberate decision by Microsoft and it is not a deal-breaker. LSP is a Minimum Viable Product that was deliberately kept simple to encourage uptake and not spook people away. Once people are comfortable that it is a good idea and not an EEE play by Microsoft, version 2.0 could be upgraded to support things like ASTs.

kuschku 9y ago
> version 2.0 could be upgraded to support things like ASTs. That’s called "you can create an entirely new API that’s entirely different, but might use the same name". That’s the issue here, LSP is so fundamentally flawed you’d have to scrap it entirely to support what is needed for a real IDE.