>This is ad-hominem and smug. As counterpoint, I didn't interpret it that way. The tone wasn't shaming a programmer for accidentally screwing up (e.g. It was

>This is ad-hominem and smug. As counterpoint, I didn't interpret it that way. The tone wasn't shaming a programmer for accidentally screwing up (e.g. It was Michael who deleted everything with UNIX command "rm -rf /* "). Instead, today's blog was extending the conversation of the message he sent 3 months ago[1] and he had already put Junio Hamano's name in that post. If you're trying to trace the intellectual history and rationale for why things were done a certain way, attaching a name to it is very common and it does not mean malicious intent. I didn't see any ad-hominem attacks in the post but I can only guess that the repetition of "Hamano" in the text rubs people the wrong way. [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/EA993AC0-022C-423D-ABD7-4747FA09E7FE@fabulich.com/T/#u https://public-inbox.org/git/EA993AC0-022C-423D-ABD7-4747FA0...