> Upon which the regulations will be adjusted accordingly. So you seem to be advocating for wide, sweeping bans and regulations, and then working backwards if

> Upon which the regulations will be adjusted accordingly. So you seem to be advocating for wide, sweeping bans and regulations, and then working backwards if the technology doesn't pan out. I'm advocating the opposite: tax credits, incentives, etc. to move the technology forward and when it's ready, perhaps make the big shift to all electric. > You mean like by the election they just had? I guess we differ on the authority that elections that for out should have. But that is a more ideological issue, so I'll concede the point.