4 ms·
The overly simple answer is Romans-->Byzantines-->Ottomans. Rome is at one point divided into two empires, West and East. West Empire collapse, but East Empi
by Top19 9y ago
The overly simple answer is
Romans-->Byzantines-->Ottomans.
Rome is at one point divided into two empires, West and East.
West Empire collapse, but East Empire keeps going with its capital at Constantinople. East Empire becomes the Byzantine Empire now.
East Empire actually ALMOST reunites with the West,
and Justinian's top general, Belisarius, actually captures Rome in the mid 500's. He fails to hold the Italian peninsula for a variety of reasons, and Western Europe slips away.
The Turkish Empire then begins rising around the 1300's, one of many many trends driven by the Mongols and their invasions.
In the 1440s the Turkish Empire (the Ottomans basically), wipe out the kingdoms of Eastern Europe. Eastern Europe actually has a really rich history but unfortunately has had the thankless task of saving Europe over and over by being a "bullet sponge" for the powers on either side.
In 1453 the Ottomans capture Constantinople and begin their empire.
By the 1800s the empire falls into disrepair, and is now regarded as the "sick man of Europe". This is further compounded by choosing the wrong side in World War I. At the end of the war the Ottoman empire is dissolved by various treaties.
This leaves the remaining core of Turkey. Interestingly it also puts Iraq, Iran, and Palestine into the hands of the British, beginning a long road to the revolution in Iran, the various Israeli / Palestinian negotiations, and eventually, the war in Iraq.
TL;DR: Basically you can trace the fall of the Roman empire in the 500's to ISIS today somewhat simply.
- woodandsteel 9y agoThank you for laying this out. Most Americans don't know this chunk of history, but it is essential for understanding today's world.
- kirrent 9y agoSure, I understood that. My interest was that given the knowledge that the Byzantines and Ottomans were enemies and then the Ottomans conquered the entire region, what would be the relevance of an Ottoman tradition to assassination of a Byzantine emperor? Was there some mixing of cultures at some point to the extent that strangulation was adopted in Byzantium? Now that I've re-read the great grand parent post, I assume that it was meant as an aside about Ottoman emperors.