5 ms·
They don't here is what Bell said: "There is a way to escape the inference of superluminal speeds and spooky action at a distance. But it involves absolute det
by miltondts 9y ago
They don't here is what Bell said:
"There is a way to escape the inference of superluminal speeds and spooky action at a distance. But it involves absolute determinism in the universe, the complete absence of free will. Suppose the world is super-deterministic, with not just inanimate nature running on behind-the-scenes clockwork, but with our behavior, including our belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than another, absolutely predetermined, including the ‘decision’ by the experimenter to carry out one set of measurements rather than another, the difficulty disappears. There is no need for a faster-than-light signal to tell particle A what measurement has been carried out on particle B, because the universe, including particle A, already ‘knows’ what that measurement, and its outcome, will be."
- euyyn 9y agoOk, and barred that?
- BoiledCabbage 9y agoI could be mixing things here, but aren't the three options losing one of locality, definitiveness and non-conspiracy? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_definiteness#Overview https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_definiteness#Ov...