3 ms·
Entanglement would too, if it allowed superluminal communication in the classical sense. But, it doesn't- you can't use entanglement to send information, even i
by roywiggins 9y ago
Entanglement would too, if it allowed superluminal communication in the classical sense. But, it doesn't- you can't use entanglement to send information, even if there is a spooky interaction at a distance.
Retrocausality would probably work in the same way.
- rf15 9y agogood comparison, sure sounds like entanglement in parts
- roywiggins 9y agoI think the idea is to use retrocausality to replace entanglement. No spooky action at a distance- it's just that when you observe one of the pair, it retroactively "picks" the state it always was, which retroactively sets the state of its partner back when they were first entangled.