The author also points out that WikiLeaks has published things that are not in the public interest to publish (e.g. the sorority ceremony), not theirs to publis

The author also points out that WikiLeaks has published things that are not in the public interest to publish (e.g. the sorority ceremony), not theirs to publish (e.g. the copyrighted book), or that, the article argues, could have been handled much more effectively (the killcam video). I admit that the last point is not argued very persuasively, but there is more content in the article.