4 ms·
Interesting and related re attacks on a Tor hidden service: http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/762-Attacked-Over-Tor.html http://www.hackerfac
by ruytlm 9y ago
Interesting and related re attacks on a Tor hidden service: http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/762-Attacked-Over-Tor.html http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/762-Att...
And the follow up: http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/763-The-Continuing-Tor-Attack.html http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/763-The...
- Laforet 9y agoVery entertaining read, thank you for sharing these. I used to dismiss black ICE [0] as cyberpunk tropes and it's good to be proven ignorant. [0]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusion_Countermeasures_Electronics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusion_Countermeasures_Elec...
- vgb2k11 9y agoVery interesting read indeed. I've a question about it; the article is about defeating malicious crawlers/bots affecting a TOR hidden service, so my question is, how might the author differentiate bot requests from standard client requests on a request-by-request basis? I mean, can I assume that many kinds of requests arrive at hidden service through shared/common relays? Would this mean other fingerprinting methods (user agent etc) would be important, and if so, what options remain for the author if the attackers dynamically change/randomise their fingerprint on a per-request basis?