3 ms·
>Now you could say that it's not a big deal either way and I would tend to agree but one could argue that there's a slippery slope when you muddy the line betwe
by tormeh 9y ago
>Now you could say that it's not a big deal either way and I would tend to agree but one could argue that there's a slippery slope when you muddy the line between reality and fiction in the minds of the audience of a mass media.
In reality television that line has passed the horizon a while ago.
- stuaxo 9y agoWhere is the line? Some shows like The Only Way Is Essex in the UK was confusing when it first came out, later on we found out it wasn't "reality tv", but a new genre "curated reality".
- oxide 9y agoI much preferred some of those Gordon Ramsay series UK versions. Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares was more akin to a documentary than the US version's on FOX with its awful jumpy editing and constant music in the background. The TV becomes more compelling when game show music isn't blaring and the focus is on how to run a restaurant. Instead of only about family infighting. The extra 5 or 6 mins helps a lot, nothing feels rushed to a conclusion like US reality TV. Another good one was Gordon's Great Escape. Documentary style reality tv works so much better IMO.
- stuaxo 9y agoIndeed, those are different things, the US kitchen nightmares being more about the "people zoo" aspect.