I hear you. I do think there is a better way though, than a) always disbelieving the accuser until proven otherwise or b) always believing the accuser until pr

I hear you. I do think there is a better way though, than a) always disbelieving the accuser until proven otherwise or b) always believing the accuser until proven otherwise. Both sides can be exploited. In the case of predators, absolutely, environments that discourage accusers coming forward makes it easy for them to exploit, and that is wrong. In the case of false accusers (more common than I believe most people think), environments that take the side of an accuser makes it easy for them to exploit, and that is also wrong. There's a balance to be struck, and I think we can only consider that balance when we think about all the dynamics of all the actors.