> This person mentions multiple times that meritocracy is a bad idea, that promotion or reward based on merit should be done away with in order to promote diver

> This person mentions multiple times that meritocracy is a bad idea, that promotion or reward based on merit should be done away with in order to promote diversity, e.g., racial/gender-based quotas. She wasn't fired for that. > This is a person who does not view competence as the primary trait to select for within a market, and is insisting here that competence be downplayed to make room for people with the correct melanin levels and/or chromosomes. She wasn't fired for that either. > Uh oh! The data scientist isn't up to date on the trends in gender studies and critical theory, better send her off to sensitivity training! She was fired because GitHub alleged she was the insensitive one here. Do you agree?