4 ms·
> a company should be focused on acquiring the best developers they can, not finding ones of a specific gender I agree, that's why I think companies should con
by falsedan 9y ago
> a company should be focused on acquiring the best developers they can, not finding ones of a specific gender
I agree, that's why I think companies should consider what is putting off women & why the gender balance in tech is so heavily weighted towards males.
That is, most companies (regardless of conscious choice) are finding the best (young, white) male developers only.
- amiga-workbench 9y agoI don't think the fault lies at the employment level. I think the societal biases are imprinted in people during their social development. Girls are less likely to be given the equipment and backing to get into software development at an early age, and their peers would rarely understand such an interest. The field and the associated character traits around it are viewed as nerdy or boring, the people who don't give a stuff about such judgements seem to be the people who do gain an interest in the field and consider working in it.
- falsedan 9y ago> I don't think the fault lies at the employment level. I think companies can take steps to improve outreach to excluded groups, and set up policies to help reduce exclusionary behaviour in the workplace. I don't really care if it's their fault or not.
- hyperdunc 9y agoBiases are not just socially constructed - they're often rooted in biology. It might just be the case that for biological reasons, females (in general) aren't as interested in creating technology. The gender imbalance in fields like programming and nursing is larger in the most "fair and evolved" societies (e.g. Denmark), because these societies allow biological gender differences to more freely assert themselves.
- amiga-workbench 9y agoEquality of opportunity, not equality of outcome is something I very strongly agree with, I would be mortified to be given handouts because of a particular box I fit in. Affirmative action reeks of plastering over a bug instead of squashing it at the root cause.
- iza 9y ago> most companies (regardless of conscious choice) are finding the best (young, white) male developers only. It usually reflects the pool of applicants.
- falsedan 9y agoWhich reflects the existing industry placements + recent graduates, which reflects the university applications, which reflects the high-school graduations, which reflects the typical 50/50 gender split of the general population. If women are self-excluding, what is causing the hostility in that environment? If they're systemically-excluded, how do we remove it?
- Caveman_Coder 9y agoDisparate outcomes do not imply disparate treatment
- falsedan 9y agoSure, but we're talking about women in tech.
- fav_collector 9y ago> That is, most companies (regardless of conscious choice) are finding the best (young, white) male developers only. The implication here is that earned (through training) software and programming skills are equally distributed among the entire population. This is simply not true just by looking at StackOverflow/CS major demographics. They are finding the best female developers. There just aren't that many (for whatever reason)
- falsedan 9y ago> They are finding the best female developers. There just aren't that many (for whatever reason) This sounds like you think companies don't have an obligation to improve their environments so that women feel included. Consider a developer that you would say is among the best: would she accept a position at your company? Why not?
- dodyg 9y agoI owned a software company. Almost half of our software engineers are female now although historically it has been mostly men as typical. I had to seek out recruiting female engineers. Now with more balanced gender ratio in the company, things are just better.