4 ms·
I fully agree that newer designs are safer, but ignoring the human factor in the equation is IMO not very reasonable. Without the human factor, driving a car is
by mikejb 9y ago
I fully agree that newer designs are safer, but ignoring the human factor in the equation is IMO not very reasonable. Without the human factor, driving a car is very safe. That argument is valid, but it doesn't reflect reality.
- DougWebb 9y agoGood engineers take the human factor into account and include backups in their designs to handle failure modes caused by the human factor. What they can't do is work around politics or budgetary constraints which force trade-offs between safety and cost. Anything can be made as safe as necessary, if you're willing to pay for the redundancies. When it comes to reactors on Earth, a very large proportion of the budget is diverted to bureaucratic paperwork, lobbying, and PR, which could instead be used to pay for additional safety measures.
- thehardsphere 9y agoThere are some "human factor" problems that engineers cannot and should not be expected to resolve. I mean, how can someone design a communist-proof nuclear reactor?
- striking 9y agoMake them pay to get in?
- thehardsphere 9y agoWouldn't work. They know how to steal and can even make fiat currency outside of the free market context. Not a bad idea though.