3 ms·

I don't think it is so much about it being a "bomb". I'm gonna take a stab and say it may be related to the ability to take over the control system of the plane

by vxxzy 9y ago

I don't think it is so much about it being a "bomb". I'm gonna take a stab and say it may be related to the ability to take over the control system of the plane via a laptop/wifi [1]. It would make sense to some degree if the US knew that an airline had planes that were "unpatched". [1]: http://observer.com/2016/02/midair-hack-shows-the-dangers-of-in-flight-wi-fi/ http://observer.com/2016/02/midair-hack-shows-the-dangers-of...

rigden33 9y ago
No it's almost certainly due to the recent intel that found that ISIL had developed a way to hide bombs in laptops to evade airport security. http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bombs-may-evade-security/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bomb... http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/isis-laptop-bomb-threat-planes-carry-on-ban-europe-middle-east/ http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/isis-laptop-bomb-threat-planes...
- jbg_ 9y ago
  Let's see... they developed a way to hide a bomb powerful enough to bring down an airliner inside a laptop, but not a way to buy tickets for flights other than a few specific routes on a few specific airlines? If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  - rigden33 9y ago
    I admit it's a little odd. Relatedly, the UK also instituted a similar laptop ban as well. If not the laptop bomb threat, then what do you think it is? http://www.wired.co.uk/article/uk-laptop-ban-flights-explained http://www.wired.co.uk/article/uk-laptop-ban-flights-explain...
    - jbg_ 9y ago
      I know some (maybe even most) of the affected airlines have significant government ownership. It could therefore be a way of gaining political leverage. It could also be a leg-up to American carriers competing on those routes. Another commercial option is a tactic to require implementation of security practices that involve American-made equipment. I'm sure there are many other possibilities that make more sense than the public explanation, which only seems to make sense if we assume the people protecting us are incredibly stupid. I don't think they are, so the public story is probably just a cover.
      - sqeaky 9y ago
        What if instead of being stupid they were artificially limited in some other way? Perhaps, they wanted a more comprehensive laptop ban but were stopped by someone.
pyre 9y ago
This just reminds me of this: http://dilbert.com/strip/1997-09-10 http://dilbert.com/strip/1997-09-10

by vxxzy 9y ago

rigden33 9y ago

No it's almost certainly due to the recent intel that found that ISIL had developed a way to hide bombs in laptops to evade airport security. http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bombs-may-evade-security/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/terrorist-laptop-bomb... http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/isis-laptop-bomb-threat-planes-carry-on-ban-europe-middle-east/ http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/isis-laptop-bomb-threat-planes...

jbg_ 9y ago
Let's see... they developed a way to hide a bomb powerful enough to bring down an airliner inside a laptop, but not a way to buy tickets for flights other than a few specific routes on a few specific airlines? If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you.
- rigden33 9y ago
  I admit it's a little odd. Relatedly, the UK also instituted a similar laptop ban as well. If not the laptop bomb threat, then what do you think it is? http://www.wired.co.uk/article/uk-laptop-ban-flights-explained http://www.wired.co.uk/article/uk-laptop-ban-flights-explain...
  - jbg_ 9y ago
    I know some (maybe even most) of the affected airlines have significant government ownership. It could therefore be a way of gaining political leverage. It could also be a leg-up to American carriers competing on those routes. Another commercial option is a tactic to require implementation of security practices that involve American-made equipment. I'm sure there are many other possibilities that make more sense than the public explanation, which only seems to make sense if we assume the people protecting us are incredibly stupid. I don't think they are, so the public story is probably just a cover.
    - sqeaky 9y ago
      What if instead of being stupid they were artificially limited in some other way? Perhaps, they wanted a more comprehensive laptop ban but were stopped by someone.

pyre 9y ago

This just reminds me of this: http://dilbert.com/strip/1997-09-10 http://dilbert.com/strip/1997-09-10