3 ms·
Large and old are factors on the indivdual. But preyed upon is a factor impacting on the history of a species (all individuals). So a (in evolutionary terms re
by Pica_soO 9y ago
Large and old are factors on the indivdual. But preyed upon is a factor impacting on the history of a species (all individuals).
So a (in evolutionary terms recently) huge, old rodent, still carrys the baggage of the past.
The size matters only in evolutionary time lengths - if a lot of individuals are to big to be predated.
PS: Was the factor of age reduced cell division as a tumor hiding factor even removed from the statistics?
Finally what about metabolism rate as amplifier of cancer? Slow metabolisms with a constant intake (no peaks of production and consumption), no constant heating costs due to small body size.
My "Speculation" is just there to remind people that taking some individual factors and correlating them into seemingly meaningful results ignores the complexity of the situation.
- folli 9y agoPlease note that the word "animal" in the quote of Peto's paradox and my comment refers to "species" and not an "individual", as you infer in your reply. So yes, the species will include the baggage of the past.
- Pica_soO 9y agoWhich in itself is interesting.. which animals did we know to continuously grow for live and only recently hitting upon hard times. Dinosaurs- but birds do get cancer and are not predated- crocodiles and Commode-dragons seem to be excluded. Maybe im wrong here.