4 ms·
you do not even need that. just set appetite = 80 in the human source code so you start eating 80÷ of your daily caloric use. the pounds will melt off. when yo
by logicallee 9y ago
you do not even need that. just set appetite = 80 in the human source code so you start eating 80÷ of your daily caloric use. the pounds will melt off. when you have a goal weight set appetite = 100÷ and you will simply stay at that weight.
it is very simple physically.
as for where to set it, I have nothing to say about it just as you have nothing to say about how to make a choice.
/s
The fact is, a choice fat people can make is "I will get gastric sleeve surgery" and this "commit" is statistically enough.
the "commit" that parent suggests is the same as my suggestion at the top. I give no practical advice at the top of this comment and neither does parent comment.
if there were a variable that would set someone's appetite and saciety then it would work. if there were a variable for commitment then parent's advice would work.
parent ignores the hard work of finding and setting that variable, and parent ignores statistics that most fat people have spent a few dozen hours looking for how to set that variable and have failed to do so.
your advice is as bad as when people defend some totally useless setup on the grounds that it's turing complete. yes, you can make a social media app with a custom backend written in C++. No that does not work statistically and most people who set out to do so fail.
but physically it's very simple.
reasonable people don't ignore the statistics.
- moogly 9y agohttps://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/why-you-cant-lose-weight-on-a-diet.html https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/why-you-ca... Apparently, boffins are starting to realise it's not that simple.
- tome 9y agoA neuroscientist claims neuroscience is the key component that makes weight loss difficult. Colour me sceptical.