an incorrect/incomplete assumption will almost always lead to an incorrect/incomplete conclusion. The premise of the entire post is the fact that Knight Foundat

an incorrect/incomplete assumption will almost always lead to an incorrect/incomplete conclusion. The premise of the entire post is the fact that Knight Foundation rejected Wikileaks' request for funding. Now, unless the reasons have been made public, writing such a piece that is one-sided and highly opinionated. Now, what wikileaks does can be up for debate but a debate based on facts nonetheless. The comparison between the 2007 video and the abu ghraib lawsuits is incoherent at best. There has been enough uproar and reactions upon the public release of the video. As long as Wikileaks doesn't hinder any undergoing investigation by busting the dam a bit too early, i believe the idea does work towards greater good and opens channels of information that would have been hushed up.