he should also sue then for impersonating and harassing. he trusted then to handle his private personal email. instead they sent out millions of messages fakin

he should also sue then for impersonating and harassing. he trusted then to handle his private personal email. instead they sent out millions of messages faking that it was from his account, when they could have used, literally, any other combination of words to tell the recipients that they should not reply to the message. change no to dont, and it is even more functional to the intended purpose. it's so trivial to use another bogus email on the from field that his lawyer should have no problem claiming it might have been a malicious employer harassing him. because, really, that's the only explanation that is actually plausible.