I'm certain the terms of service he agreed to allow the service provider to discontinue service with some amount of notice (30 days seems likely since that's wh

I'm certain the terms of service he agreed to allow the service provider to discontinue service with some amount of notice (30 days seems likely since that's what they gave him here). I've never signed up for any service that I can recall that didn't explicitly allow either party to discontinue it. While I'm pretty on board with the notion of some kind of internet access as a modern human right, I can't really see an argument for a right to a specific email address with a specific email provider. It's shitty that they've only given him 30 days. And, it's shitty that they didn't do something about it much, much sooner (noreply has been around for a long time as a common address for customer service emails, though maybe not 20 years), before his life became so entangled in this specific email address. But, I don't think the law is on his side. I doubt he'd find a lawyer to take the case without paying a lot for the service. And, I really doubt he'd win such a lawsuit.