4 ms·
From the article, in "Replies": The fact that man does not understand Chinese is irrelevant, because it is only the system as a whole that matters. Searle note
by bwasti 9y ago
From the article, in "Replies":
The fact that man does not understand Chinese is irrelevant, because it is only the system as a whole that matters.
Searle notes that (in this simple version of the reply) the "system" is nothing more than a collection of ordinary physical objects; it grants the power of understanding and consciousness to "the conjunction of that person and bits of paper" without making any effort to explain how this pile of objects has become a conscious, thinking being. Searle argues that no reasonable person should be satisfied with the reply, unless they are "under the grip of an ideology".
- dTal 9y agoSearle's note applies equally to an "ordinary" brain, which is just a collection of ordinary physical objects (atoms).