3 ms·
> For starters I probably have the JS cached. this is one of those fallacies that people keep repeating and actually believe as truth. if you look at the heade
by leeoniya 9y ago
> For starters I probably have the JS cached.
this is one of those fallacies that people keep repeating and actually believe as truth. if you look at the headers of the youtube player file i linked, you'll see that anyone who had it cached prior to Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:12:45 GMT is out of luck as well as myself when i request in > 48 hours. i dunno how often it changes, but it's safe to say "very frequently".
date:Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:23:58 GMT
expires:Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:23:58 GMT
last-modified:Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:12:45 GMT
also relevant: https://twitter.com/HenriHelvetica/status/877924754195324928 https://twitter.com/HenriHelvetica/status/877924754195324928
- TeMPOraL 9y agoA good point. RE that tweet, I assume the values there are in milliseconds. I hate it when people don't label their axes.
- matt_wulfeck 9y agoIsn't it cached from any website I visit that uses it though? Almost for sure by the time I land on this particular page I've picked up the JS like some virus.