3 ms·
> There were no adverse effects on quality of life Does quality of life have some specific medical meaning? I'd say not being able to eat as much would be a hu
by greggman 9y ago
> There were no adverse effects on quality of life
Does quality of life have some specific medical meaning? I'd say not being able to eat as much would be a huge reduction in quality of life for myself and many people in know. No I don't massively over eat like many Americans but I love eating and cooking and going out to dinner. Trying to keep calories at or below 2000 is hard enough. I can't imagine having to try to enjoy even less.
- rubatuga 9y agoWell, the thing is your ideas and feelings might change after the fasting period, and you may end up thinking that it hasn’t negatively impacted your life.
- d8421l01vv4r 9y agoFrom https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv057 https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv057 We found no significant adverse effects of CR [calorie restriction] on a broad range of quality of life variables including mood, self-reported hunger, sexual function, and cognitive function, using validated measures of all constructs. These results are shown in online Supplementary eTable 3. > Trying to keep calories at or below 2000 is hard enough. How much of a reduction from your baseline usage is 2000 kcal per day?
- scottLobster 9y agoIt's actually quite easy after the first few days. Your body simply has to adjust to burning fat/glycogen. I've gone days when I've eaten maybe 500 calories and never felt hungry, but the first day I thought I was going to pass out. One thing you learn from fasting is to recognize when your body actually needs food vs when you just crave a blood-sugar-rush. What most people think of as "hungry" is really just a trained reflex, and it can be retrained. These days if I'm not active I can easily go at least 12 hours without feeling hungry. Granted my job is sitting in a cube 9 hours a day with some scattered meetings. YMMV.