4 ms·
Ehhh, let's not pretend it's not a two-way street. You offer your service for free because you want people to use it. Maybe people shouldn't expect much from f
by BenchRouter 9y ago
Ehhh, let's not pretend it's not a two-way street. You offer your service for free because you want people to use it.
Maybe people shouldn't expect much from free services, but free services also then shouldn't expect much from its users (i.e. that they might get angry quickly and drop their service on a whim).
> If you build your... business on shaky ground (free services) there's an inherent risk it gets pulled out from under you at any moment.
This also very much applies to Photobucket. This could very well be the thing that kills it.
- QuinnyPig 9y agoI can’t imagine anyone trusting Photobucket after this. Who’s to say they don’t pull this stunt again in a year for $3k?
- brogrammernot 9y agoSure. I can agree with that. I've always thought that with any free service I've used that the naming implies it's temporary, such as "Hobby" or "Developer" and that's the extent it goes. When it shuts down or asks for money it's a cost/benefit analysis. There's companies that let you host for free, but eventually if all companies charge then they'll end up paying. I don't have any issue with users hopping from free service to free service but there's no contract between the parties with a free service besides that a TOS can change at any moment.
- BenchRouter 9y agoYeah that's fair, but I don't think anyone affected by this is preparing to file a lawsuit or implying there was a breach of contract. Other than basic human sympathy, I don't think too many posters here are really expressing any deep sympathy for those affected, either. People are more just questioning this decision from Photobucket's end: The sudden change in TOS is unlikely to go over well, and the price seems extremely steep. One wonders whether charging $10/month and sending out several explicit announcements beforehand would've resulted in a much better outcome. That being said, I'll concede that this move may turn out to be brilliant for Photobucket, so I suppose we'll see what happens. To make an analogy: Sure, you're free to be an asshole to people. No one's questioning that technically you have the right to be one. But don't be surprised when people don't want to be around you anymore, and if your goal is to make friends (customers) one wonders why you would decide on that course of action.