3 ms·
The issue here isn't that PhotoBucket are charging to host images. It's the no-notice change and the size of the charge. Effectively they've knocked people of
by AndrewDucker 9y ago
The issue here isn't that PhotoBucket are charging to host images. It's the no-notice change and the size of the charge.
Effectively they've knocked people off Ebay telling them that they can keep their sales for a one-off payment of £300.
If they'd given them two weeks notice then people could have evaluated the cost and decided if £300/year was a reasonable amount to pay, or if they should migrate elsewhere.
Doing it like this basically forces some people to pay up instantly. That's not fair dealing, that's rather more mafia-like.
- UnoriginalGuy 9y agoBecause PhotoBucket know that if people even had two weeks to evaluate it, they'd put their images on AWS's S3 service instead for pennies on the dollar.