3 ms·
It's a shame Amazon doesn't contract with some image hosting service for its store. Maybe they could use Azure or Google Cloud Storage to serve files via HTTP.
by NelsonMinar 9y ago
It's a shame Amazon doesn't contract with some image hosting service for its store. Maybe they could use Azure or Google Cloud Storage to serve files via HTTP.
- WillKirkby 9y agowhy not AWS?
- acveilleux 9y agoI think that was sarcasm but maybe a little too dry.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- CapitalistCartr 9y agoI hear AWS is pretty affordable. Maybe they could get a volume discount.
- kennydude 9y agoIt even has a file storage service which actually works
- MatthewWilkes 9y agoHonestly, this is the most surprising thing for me. Allowing page views to make HTTP calls to external hosts that aren't controlled by Amazon would let them track user behaviour across their listings. Facebook stopped that with profile images a long time ago.