I am pleased to see you attempt a logical exploration of this topic. However, I object to a couple points. First, there is almost always potential for conseque

I am pleased to see you attempt a logical exploration of this topic. However, I object to a couple points. First, there is almost always potential for consequences for saying no, so long as you allow a physical power imbalance. Second, and most importantly, you are neglecting that power imbalance forms an entire framework for human sexual interaction, one which is as old as our species. This is at a minimum a biological imperative (hormonal, genetic) and an emergent psychological imperative (physical size/strength/endurance differences). These natural drives are responsible for most men desiring power and most women desiring powerful men. Now suddenly, over the last few decades, we've turned this intrinsic human nature on its head, and I think that is why this is such a difficult topic for people to grasp/discuss. I think people underestimate how far removed the current push for gender parity is from human history. This is more of an experiment than most people realize.