4 ms·
Did I overlook something? As far as I can see, the article backs up their relevant claims with links to public sources. Which claims do you mean? (To be more
by vog 9y ago
Did I overlook something? As far as I can see, the article backs up their relevant claims with links to public sources.
Which claims do you mean?
(To be more precise: There is a lot of ranting in this article, and digressions about Altman's motivation are of course purely speculative. But all relevant claims seem to be backed up with sources.)
- roadbeats 9y agoThey title article "threat" but there is no content about threat. Is the claim of "threat" not baseless ?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]