5 ms·
You don't learn anything by studying other architectures?
by pknopf 9y ago
You don't learn anything by studying other architectures?
- adzm 9y agoFor even more fun, compare with inferno
- e1g 9y agoFWIW a React lead said Inferno is how they would've designed React if they had to do it from scratch, and it's author joined Facebook to push React efforts forward.
- sAbakumoff 9y ago"Inferno 1.0 is really well written. It's how I would've rewritten React. I'd recommend reading its source to learn." - reading the source is much more effective than reading an article written by someone who read the source code.
- lazyasciiart 9y agoWhat are you doing on HN when you could be off reading source code?
- sAbakumoff 9y agoI don't think that your question makes any sense. I read both of HN and the source code.
- icebraining 9y agoAnd people can read both the article and the source code.
- mst 9y agoSo does that mean inferno is both theoretically better and already dead? :(
- e1g 9y agoHehe. I think it's Open Source at play: X publishes an innovative method, Y iterates with a cleaner version benefiting from lessons-learnt, X says "awesome, let's join forces!" and they live together happily thereafter. Inferno passed over to another lead who's pushing it forward. IMO this is a good outcome: there is some marginal value in yet another "React-like but faster" library, but the same energy could help a lot more people if applied directly to the source of the madness.
- sAbakumoff 9y agoThis is very specific architecture for a very specific product. I really don't think that I can learn anything from all these UML diagrams. I was just wondering what the author had in mind.
- TimMurnaghan 9y agoStill not really a UML diagram. It's a flow chart. Of course if javascript programmers encapsulated things with actual objects then maybe UML would be applicable.
- sAbakumoff 9y agoflow chart != UML activity diagram?
- bliashenko 9y agothis's the answer.