4 ms·
There have been many, many failed attempts at introducing phonetic/phonemic/simplified spelling systems for English. It’s a surprisingly hard problem both techn
by evincarofautumn 9y ago
There have been many, many failed attempts at introducing phonetic/phonemic/simplified spelling systems for English. It’s a surprisingly hard problem both technically and socially.
For starters, we probably can’t split “th” into “þ” and “ð” because of words like “with”, where “wiþ” and “wið” are in free variation; even words like “thank”, which you might expect to be uniformly “þank”, show up as “ðank” in some dialects, sometimes also in free variation.
English consonants are pretty consistent across dialects, with a few rare exceptions (like [x] in Scottish “loch”), but the vowels are all over the place phonetically. Even attempts to represent them phonemically (e.g. the 24 Standard Lexical Sets[1]) aren’t perfect across dialects because of the presence of different vowel mergers & splits, as well as one-off exceptions.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_set https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_set
- kwhitefoot 9y agoI think that the fact that English uses a small alphabet and no diacritical marks (except for a few loan words) and hence cannot closely specify pronunciation is a strength not a weakness. It makes English inclusive and usable by people with widely (or wildly) varying accents and dialects.