3 ms·
I think to understand the point I'm trying to make, we could re-examine your previous statement: "Am I foolish and not obeying the laws of economics for buying
by jbooth 16y ago
I think to understand the point I'm trying to make, we could re-examine your previous statement: "Am I foolish and not obeying the laws of economics for buying video games, which have an expected payoff of $0?"
If the laws of economics predict that you shouldn't buy that video game, then you're not foolish -- they are.
People's behavior changes radically when you give them experimental situations that involve gaining or losing money -- they're way more risk averse with losing 100$ then they are with changing their odds of winning 100$. This isn't baked into the assumptions that economics makes, and neither are a million other wrinkles of human behavior.
"What economists say" isn't the be-all and end-all, it's just another prism to be used.
- yummyfajitas 16y agoIf the laws of economics predict that you shouldn't buy that video game, then you're not foolish -- they are. The laws of economics make no such prediction, and they make no corresponding prediction about lottery tickets. That's the point. There are places where the laws of economics don't work, I just don't believe that your previous post (or Karelis article) identifies any of them.