For things as simple as simple Bayesian filters, I'd agree. But I wouldn't be surprised if a sufficiently advanced filter is indistinguishable from intelligenc

For things as simple as simple Bayesian filters, I'd agree. But I wouldn't be surprised if a sufficiently advanced filter is indistinguishable from intelligence. Otherwise, you could make the argument: "It is an easy mistake to believe that things as simple as neurons can emulate intelligence. It requires intelligence to determine whether someone else is intelligent or not, not a bunch of firing thresholds."