A "constant murmur" isn't testimony. Testimony includes specifics like the people involved, the time and place of the incident, and what precisely happened. A m

A "constant murmur" isn't testimony. Testimony includes specifics like the people involved, the time and place of the incident, and what precisely happened. A murmur doesn't need any of that. Not the least, because no one goes on the record for a murmur. ...the idea that it isn't evidence because you don't like it is not actually how the legal system (or culture) works. What does this have to do with whether I like it or not?