4 ms·
> >An analysis of Sci-Hub’s server logs, published in Science in 2016, found its biggest users were people in Iran, India and China. Such middle-income countrie
by pen2l 9y ago
> >An analysis of Sci-Hub’s server logs, published in Science in 2016, found its biggest users were people in Iran, India and China. Such middle-income countries do not qualify for the subsidies big publishers provide to users in the poorest nations, but their universities nevertheless may not be able to afford subscriptions.
How did Science get Scihub's server logs? Did scihub give them to Science? It's annoying that the economist is not linking to this supposed Science 2016 publication. If they did, I would have known how to access and read that publication (because I know this one website which would let me read it).
- MagnumOpus 9y ago> It's annoying that the economist is not linking to this supposed Science 2016 publication The Economist's usual readership is literate and can use search engines. The Science publication is literally the first result of the obvious search term.
- pen2l 9y agoThe readership of Science journal itself is literate and could use search engines. But they do the obvious task of linking to relevant references. If the Economist is in the business of distributing information, linking to a journal should sort of be one of the things they do. Even Buzzfeed and such outlets now do the common courtesy of linking to papers that they are talking about.