Thanks for liberating those quotes from the shackles of Elsevier (and fixing the parent). About the letter 'p': I'd ban the word 'significant' instead if we're

Thanks for liberating those quotes from the shackles of Elsevier (and fixing the parent). About the letter 'p': I'd ban the word 'significant' instead if we're going to go there. You could say something like 'null-improbable' if you insisted on using NHST -- such a term would make it harder to forget that it's a fiddly technical concept.