5 ms·
In the past history of ICOs, did anyone gain from participating in the ICO more than they could have gained by buying the coin later in an exchange?
by fiatjaf 9y ago
In the past history of ICOs, did anyone gain from participating in the ICO more than they could have gained by buying the coin later in an exchange?
- sirpauldenino 9y agohttps://icostats.com/roi-since-ico https://icostats.com/roi-since-ico
- ksahin 9y agoTo complete the link, there is a story behind each ICO, some ICOs were "disasters", i.e there was a hidden cap (a maximum amount where the ICO stops) and people flooded the blockchain with high fees transactions and only some "whales" did particpate. For example, this happened with Basic Attention Token (150 people only did the ICO if I remember correctly), but also with Status, Bancor etc. So when you have 10 000+ people trying to buy a token, and only a few hundreds achieve to buy it because the network does not scale yet and a bunch of people with a lot of money can afford 1000$+ transaction fees, these tokens skyrocket once they hits exchanges.
- ggambetta 9y agoWhat a fun UI! If you click the > arrow, you go from page 1/2 to page 2/2 to... page 0/2. From there you can click the < arrow to go to negative pages.
- Subcide 9y agoYes, though usually not by just holding. ICOs with small caps often list on exchanges at a decent % profit in the first few days, while the people that missed out on the ICO buy in. The link the other user posted obviously doesn't take this into account, and only tracks holding the token indefinitely. In all likelihood, a LOT of people profited on the ICOs that ICOStats lists as negative right now.
- beager 9y agoThis sounds like the same dynamic that institutional investors use on IPOs, where only privileged players get to buy in the IPO, and they sell through a pop fueled by hype or an underestimated target. Shares hit the general public and by the time you've got a few quarterly calls in, the true value is set and the long road begins, while the institutionals and earlier investors have already cashed out some good gains. If democratizing access to ownership offerings for the purpose of quick sell off is the major benefit of ICOs, what does this do for serious businesses? Why would they choose an inherently less stable and less secure (cf. DAO hack on Ethereum) medium if it primarily benefits the investors and not the company? Beyond that, it remains to be seen what IRL innovations can be enabled by ICO, whether more easily or necessarily vis a vis traditional fundraising vehicles.
- Anderkent 9y agoI.e. the greater fool theory - buy the ICO so that you can sell it for someone who bought into the hype at a higher price later on.
- fiatjaf 9y agoWell, these statistics take in account only a short period of time in which all coins and tokens were going upward like crazy.